US Election 2008 Blog

But Candidates Have Taken Positions Exceeding Mainstream of a Few Years Ago

Perry Bacon Jr., Washington Post

After Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, publicly declared in March that homosexuality was immoral, gay supporters of Sens. Barack Obama of Illinois and Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York were furious when neither presidential candidate was very critical of Pace.

They let both campaigns know it, and the next day Clinton and Obama said they do not consider homosexuality immoral.

The tentative reactions suggest the caution with which the two leading Democratic contenders approach gay rights issues when they are publicly debated. “The antenna goes up,” acknowledges Ethan Geto, an informal adviser to Clinton on gay rights issues. “It’s a measure of how volatile gay rights issues are in national politics.”

Read the rest of this entry »

By Dante Chinni, Christian Science Monitor

Washington - A debate, as defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, is “a contention by words or arguments … as a regulated discussion of a proposition between two matched sides.”

If you have watched any of the “debates” among the 2008 Democratic and Republican presidential hopefuls, you might be wondering if US news media read the dictionary much. The events featuring eight potential Democratic and 10 possible Republican nominees, each lined up on their respective stages, look and feel less like debates than talent shows. Each candidate wants to stand out and be noticed, without saying or doing something that might embarrass himself or herself.

As painful as they can be to watch, these early debates are nothing new. The Democrats’ first primary debate for the 2004 presidential race was held on May 3, 2003 – there were nine candidates in that one. You probably don’t remember it because it wasn’t televised until hours after it ended and not televised at all in some parts of country.

Read the rest of this entry »

Associated Press

NEW YORK - Presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton has won the endorsement of New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez , a prominent Hispanic Democrat and leading political voice in the vote-rich state.

The endorsement was scheduled to be announced Tuesday in Washington, two Democrats familiar with the situation said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because of the planned formal announcement.

Menendez, a Cuban-American and former member of the House leadership, was appointed in December 2005 to fill the Senate seat of Gov.-elect Jon Corzine. Menendez was re-elected in 2006, defeating Thomas Kean Jr., the son of the former Republican governor, in a hard-fought and expensive race.

Clinton raised money and campaigned for Menendez during his re-election bid.

Menendez is one of just three Hispanics in the Senate, along with Republican Mel Martinez (news, bio, voting record) of Florida and Democrat Ken Salazar (news, bio, voting record) of Colorado.

The Menendez endorsement follows that of another prominent Hispanic Democrat, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. Both California and New Jersey are among several large states hosting primaries Feb. 5.

Read the rest of this entry »

By George F. Will, Washington Post

Early in George W. Bush’s presidency, liberal critics said: The economy is not growing. Which was true. He inherited the debris of the 1990s’ irrational exuberances. A brief (eight months) and mild (the mildest since World War II) recession began in March 2001, before any of his policies were implemented. It ended in November 2001.

In 2002, when his tax cuts kicked in and the economy began 65 months — so far — of uninterrupted growth, critics said: But it is a “jobless recovery.” When the unemployment rate steadily declined — today it is 4.5 percent; time was, 6 percent was considered full employment — critics said: Well, all right, the economy is growing and creating jobs and wealth, but the wealth is not being distributed in accordance with the laws of God or Nature or liberalism or something.

Last Sunday, eight Democratic presidential candidates debated for two hours, saying about the economy . . . next to nothing. You must slog to Page 43 in the 51-page transcript before Barack Obama laments that “the burdens and benefits of this new global economy are not being spread evenly across the board” and promises to “institute some fairness in the system.”

Well. When in the long human story have economic burdens and benefits been “spread evenly”? Does Obama think they should be, even though talents never are? What relationship of “fairness” does he envision between the value received by individuals and the value added by them? Does he disagree — if so, on what evidence? — with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke that “the influence of globalization on inequality has been moderate and almost surely less important than the effects of skill-biased technological change”?

Read the rest of this entry »

By Joan Vennochi, Boston Globe

THE NEXT time the Democrats debate, they should pull out a chair for Bill Clinton.

Wolf Blitzer asked all the candidates what they would do with Bill Clinton if they were elected president. His question was clearly posed to get Hillary Clinton to talk about her husband’s role in any future Clinton administration.

Mike Gravel, the former senator from Alaska, said he would use Clinton as a goodwill ambassador, adding, to laughter, “He can take his wife with him; she’ll still be in the Senate.”

Hillary Clinton said, “Bill Clinton, my dear husband, would be sent around the world as a roving ambassador.” There isn’t a problem we face, she added, “where we don’t need friends and allies, and he would be a tremendous help.”

At another moment, Hillary Clinton was asked whether the Clinton administration’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy regarding gays and lesbians in the military was a mistake. She called it “a transition policy.” Then, when the candidates were asked what they would do if they had information about Osama bin Laden’s whereabouts, Clinton noted, “My husband tried to take out bin Laden.”

Her opponents also used Bill Clinton as a reference point. Senator Joe Biden of Delaware noted that he “came to your husband” to make the case for US involvement in the Balkans. When asked to give his “definition of rich,” Senator Barack Obama of Illinois referenced tax policy “back to when Clinton was in office.”

For Hillary Clinton, this could be a plus with voters who yearn for the Clinton years. But it also focuses attention on a complicated political and marital relationship — and is all about the past.

The Clintons, of all politicians, know that presidential elections are about the future. Remember the Clinton-Gore campaign song of 1992? The refrain went, “Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow.” It wasn’t “Yesterday.”

By Laura Smith-Spark, BBC News
Manchester, New Hampshire

Want to meet the next president of the United States? Move to New Hampshire and you stand a good chance.

In a country of some 300 million people, the state’s 1.3 million residents are perhaps the most heavily-canvassed and targeted voters of any in the nation, bar Iowa.

Last week each party’s candidates flocked to New Hampshire for the latest televised debates, as they seek the all-important nomination to run for president in 2008.

And over the coming months, the contenders will court the state like no other, descending on it for house parties, 4 July parades and rallies - each time seeking vital “face time” with potential voters, in a strategy known as “retail politics”.

Read the rest of this entry »